the case is posted for hearing on 7th of September. hope for the best.
Tomorrow our case will be heard by the high court again. We are not defeated, we will win the case and we will be promoted very shortly.
ITHU NJAN ELLAVARUM VAYICHU MANASILAKKUVAN TYPE CHEYYUNNU.
CASE NATATHTHUNNATH ELLA SUBENGINEERKUM VENDIYANU. PAKSHE SAHAKARANAM ILLATHTHA MATTU SUHRUTHTHUKKAL NJANGALUTE MANASINE KETUTHTHUNNU.
CASE ORU NIRNAYAKA GHATTATHTHIL NILKKUKAYAN.
450 SUBNEGINEERMARK VENTIYANU EE CASE NATATHTHUNNATH. SAHAAYIKKAAN MANASULLAVAR CHURUKKAM.
ELLAVARUTEEYUM CHERIYA SAHAKARANAM ENKILUM KITTIYILLENKIL ITHU THITARAAN BUDHIMUTTAANU.
VALLAVARUM CASE NATATHTHI PROMOTION VANGICHCHU THANNAL NJANGAL VANGIKKOLLAM ENNU VICHARIKKUNNATH KASHTAMAANU.
ONNU PHONE CHEYYAAN MANASULLAVAR POLUMILLA.
NJANGALK CUG PHONE UNT. PAKSHE ATHU BLOGILITAAN PATTILLA.
ORU PRAVASHYAM 9447249407 VILICHCHAAL CUG NUMBER THARAM.
PLEASE TRY TO HELP
NJANGAL KOOTI UPEKSHICHCHAL PINNE SUBENGINEERKU VENTI CASE NATATHTHAN AARUMILLAATHAKUM
PLEASE CALL. I WILL GIVE MY CUG NUMBER
GIVEN BELOW IS A MODEL OF APPLICATION THAT HAS TO BE SUBMITTED BY ALL BELOW GRADATION No.2252. THIS IS ABSOLUTELY ESSENTIAL. ALL MAY COPY AND PASTE THIS IN MS WORD OR OPENOFFICE
The Chief Engineer (HRM)
(Through Proper Channel)
Sub: Promotion from the post of Sub Engineer(Ele.) to Asst. Enginer(Ele.)-
violation of seniority –reg.
Ref: 1. Provisional gradation list of Sub Engineers-Circular No. EB-
Gr.3/SE(Ele)/2003-04 dated 21.02.2004.
2. Endt. on EBI(a)/0172/AE(Ele)/2009 Tvm dated 18.02.2009 of
3. B.O. No. M IV-11552/67 dated Tvm 13.07.1967.
4. B.O. No. D IV-8927/68 dated Tvm-07.08.1969.
I may submit the following for your benign attention and favourable action.
I joined the K.S.E. Board as Sub Engineer(Ele) through direct recruitment by the KPSC on and still continuing as Sub Engineer(Ele.) at Electrical Division, Tirur.
The gradation list of Sub Engineers (Ele) cited in the reference 1st indicates that my gradation number is
Many Sub Engineers who were promoted to the Cadre of Assistant Engineers under ITI quota, vide reference cited 2nd , were having gradation numbers far below than my number on the gradation list and some of them were promoted to the Cadre of Sub Engineers from the post of Meter Reader only on 30.01.2002. Sub Engineers having ITI qualification upto the gradation number of 2252 were promoted as Assistant Engineers. Besides, many of these promotees were either overseers or Meter readers, when I entered the service of K.S.E. Board as Sub Engineer. They were promoted as Sub Engineers only one year or so after
my entry into the Board as Sub Engineer.
Promotion in this manner is obviously against natural justice. If we are happened to work under newly promoted Assistant Engineers having comparatively lower qualification and service, we fear that our morale will be hurt, degrading our efficiency in performing our duties.
This discrepancy crept in when the special rules were formulated for promotion to the cadre of Junior Engineer(Ele)(Redesignated as Assistant Engineer) vide reference 3rd cited.
At the same time, while special rules were framed for promotion to the post of Junior Engineer (Redesignated as AE) in the Civil wing of K.S.E. Board, this erroneous approach was not pursued. And in the rule it was incorporated.
“A Senior Diploma holder will not be superceded by a Junior Certificate holder for promotion in order to maintain the ratio 3:2 (Ref.4)
This was a rightful approach ensuring justice to those appearing top on the gradation list. The two different approaches on one issue are rather paradoxical and detrimental to the interest of both the employees and the organization.
Thus, it is implored that the method of promotion adopted in the case of promotion from Sub Engineers to Assistant Engineers in the Civil wing may be adopted in electrical wing as well, making me eligible for promotion at the earliest.
On 10th August Honarable Judge of the Kerala High Court Justuce P.N. Raveendran heard our contempt of court appeal. Having heard the learned counce Adv. Gopakumar, judge asked the standing counsel of KSEB to respond. The standing counsel requested one month time for promoting the respondents.
The court in its magnanimity offered to give six weeks from the date of order for complaince and reporting.
So, we got our second interim order. Eventhough some may call us lucky, I feel that it is not luck but the justness of our case is the reason and ofcourse i am not forgetting our advocate Adv. Gopakumar.
Well, this is the situation. We are still in the game. The ball is again in KSEboard’s court.
The play will continue for the next six weeks. Lets hope that tie breaker is not required after this extra time.
Thanking all who supported the movement.
Actually, the AE’s waiting to be coronated under diploma quota, whose carpet has been yanked out by the court from their feet also can join us.
We can convert this forum as the diploma holders forum.
EVERYBODY PLEASE NOTE :
WE REQUIRE INCIDENTS OF MISBEHAVIOUR, ACCIDENTS, DISPUTES, OFFENCES COMMITTED BY HR STAFF IN SUBSTATIONS TO HIGHLITE OUR CASE.
THE INFORMATION CAN BE POSTED AS COMMENT. SENT AS EMAIL OR SENT THRU SNAIL MAIL (POST OFFICE).
THIS IS MOST URGENT
VIEW JEEVAN TV NEWS
BROADCAST AT 6.30PM, 10.00PM 07-07-2009.
Please spread the word of this wonderful news.